The mage-hunter: dual daggers riding arcane rifts, packing a striking 8 defensive effects — built to close on casters, cut through their spells, and survive the answer.
Reactive, anti-magic melee with off-tank bones.
Your Primordial Blast and Smolder now refresh a charge of Runeblade. In addition, every 3rd Runeblade restores AP mana, boosted by 20% while Runic Tattoos: Water is active.
Plays like an Enhancement Shaman with a dash of Frost DK rune-mechanics: elemental-flavored weapon strikes (Smolder, Fracture, Hoarfrost, Hurricane) feed a proc-chain filler, Runeblade, itself relit by Windsage, Surging Slash and Spellfire Runes resets, while Primordial Blast and Zenith/Primordial Fury act as Lava Burst/Elemental Blast-style burst spenders. It's explicitly not a retail healing-spec analog — nothing like Chain Heal/Riptide anywhere — its 'support' reads closer to Enhancement's utility-bolted-onto-DPS identity (self-dispel via Magebreaker, a hard interrupt via Ley Lock, a Nature AoE zone via Turbulence) than to any dedicated healer profile.
How is this number calculated?
Measured scope: Zul'Gurub, all difficulties — High Priest Venoxis, High Priestess Jeklik, High Priestess Mar'li, Bloodlord Mandokir, High Priest Thekal, High Priestess Arlokk, Jin'do the Hexxer, Hakkar, Gri'lek, Gahz'ranka.
These numbers come from Ascension Logs’ public combat logs, not an in-house guess.
The index compares each spec to the median player — the one sitting exactly in the middle of the ranking — on the same boss and the same group format: 1.00 matches that median player, 1.40 means 40% more damage than them. Only each player’s best fight counts, never their average — otherwise a player posting fifty fights would count as much as fifty different players, and averaging would mostly reward beginners still learning the spec rather than those who’ve mastered it. The comparison always happens on the same boss and the same format: a two-minute fight and a seven-minute one aren’t comparable, and a flex raid doesn’t give the same support as a 25-man.
Tiers (S, A, B…) aren’t picked by hand: the cutoffs are calculated from the real spread of every measured spec. A spec under 15 distinct players or 30 fights isn't ranked at all, rather than given a made-up grade.
How is this number calculated?
Mythic dungeons only — Ascension CoA has no Mythic+ tier yet (217 tracked encounters).
These numbers come from Ascension Logs’ public combat logs, not an in-house guess.
The index compares each spec to the median player — the one sitting exactly in the middle of the ranking — on the same boss: 1.00 matches that median player, 1.40 means 40% more damage than them. Only each player’s best fight counts, never their average — otherwise a player posting fifty fights would count as much as fifty different players, and averaging would mostly reward beginners still learning the spec rather than those who’ve mastered it. The comparison always happens on the same boss: 92.4% of dungeon fights are played in 5-player groups, and splitting by group size as well would discard more usable damage rows (4.5% lost against 1.4% when comparing by boss alone) for zero additional publishable spec — group size is therefore not part of the comparison.
Tiers (S, A, B…) aren’t picked by hand: the cutoffs are calculated from the real spread of every measured Dungeon spec — this column has its own distribution, it doesn’t reuse Raid’s cutoffs. A spec under 15 distinct players or 30 fights isn't ranked at all, rather than given a made-up grade.
Each performance above links to its own real combat report. Ascension Logs, however, doesn’t offer a rankings page covering every Mythic dungeon — unlike Raid, there’s no « View the source rankings » button here.
Ranking updated on August 12, 2026
See also: all Ascension builds · the talent tree builder
Talent data: ascension.gg
· Spec tiers & analysis: ascensionsidekick.com
Editorial rewrite, interactive talent tree, tooltips and fact-checking: KAMI LABS
0 Commentaires
Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier à commenter !